UMARP connects customers, assets, maps, fieldwork, meter data, finance and compliance through shared data and workflows.
ERP, CIS, EAM, GIS and field service products each offer specialist capabilities. Utilities need those capabilities to work as one end-to-end operating model, without making a growing portfolio of integrations the center of daily operations.
Strengths: finance, budgeting, procurement and enterprise process management.
Typical boundary: network topology, meter data and field operations sit outside the core; utility workflows rely on customization and additional products.
Strengths: customer information, billing and customer experience.
Typical boundary: assets, GIS and finance often sit in separate products, making the customer-to-network-to-finance connection dependent on integration.
Strengths: maintenance, reliability and asset life-cycle management.
Typical boundary: customer accounts, billing, collections and finance are generally outside the core scope, delaying visibility of financial impacts.
Strengths: topology, location and spatial analysis.
Typical boundary: a mapping platform needs connections to other systems for work orders, stock, customer records and accounting.
Strengths: mobile teams, work orders and field evidence.
Typical boundary: the impact of fieldwork on asset life, stock, progress payments and accounting is completed in other systems.
Integrated utility management: CIS, EAM, GIS, FOM, MDM, Finance and Compliance work together using shared data.
Built-in local regulatory support: SKB, EPDK, VUK/TFRS, e-Defter, e-Fatura, UBL-TR, MERNIS and MAKS are part of the platform scope, rather than separate adaptations.
This comparison describes product categories; individual products differ in scope. The key consideration is how many separate integrations your organization will need to operate and maintain.
License fees are visible at procurement. The longer-term cost grows through integration, version compatibility, inconsistent data, middleware monitoring and the cost of moving away from a vendor.
The key difference: By designing components to work on the same platform, UMARP removes a substantial part of the integration requirement at its source.
CIS, EAM, GIS, FOM, ERP and reporting tools are purchased separately.
APIs, message queues, data transformation, mapping and synchronization add complexity.
Tracing data errors and assessing the impact of version changes become daily tasks.
Organizational data, process knowledge and reporting logic are spread across products.
CIS, EAM, GIS, field operations, MDM, finance and compliance are designed as connected parts of one platform.
The platform scope includes SKB, EPDK, VUK/TFRS, e-Defter, e-Fatura, UBL-TR, MERNIS and MAKS requirements.
Reduce overlapping licenses, extensive customization, middleware and version-compatibility costs, with investment phased over time.
A module checklist alone does not explain UMARP’s value. Evaluate how the platform supports end-to-end traceability, data integrity, evidence for regulatory review and the total cost of ownership.
We can assess where UMARP adds value against your current products, integrations, licenses, regulatory obligations and target operating model.